CONTACT CAROLINE
facebook
rss
tumblr
twitter
goodreads
youtube

  • Home
  • Write Away Blog
  • Books
    • Books
    • Trompe l’Oeil
    • Heart Land
    • Gothic Spring
    • Ballet Noir
    • Book Excerpts
  • Video Interviews
  • Press
    • News
    • Print Interviews
    • Plays
    • Ballet Noir in the Press
    • Trompe l’Oeil In The Press
    • Gothic Spring In The Press
    • Heart Land Reviews
  • Contact
  • About
  • Resources
    • Writer Resources
    • Favorite Blogs
    • Favorite Artists



A Leader Without Followers

Aug 16, 2016
by Caroline Miller
Antonin Scalia, Bernie Sanders, bias in politics, Dick Cheney, DNC, Donald Trump, Frankllin Foer, Hillary Clinton, Jeffery Tobin, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Signs Point to Russia, Vladimir Lenin
6 Comments

After the flap over Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s unflattering remarks about Donald Trump, I thought we had laid to rest the illusion that people, including justices, are impartial.  Certainly, Sandra Day O’Conner wasn’t impartial in 2000 when she decried that Al Gore seemed to be headed for the White House, then validated her opinion with her partisan decision in Bush vs. Gore. And no one would accuse Justice Antonin Scalia of impartiality when he refused to recuse himself in a case affecting the interests of his hunting buddy, Dick Cheney. (“Ginsberg,” The Week, July 20, 2016 pg. 6.)

The expectation of impartiality was recently applied to Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former head of the Democratic National Committee. (DNC)   When Wikileaks dumped thousands of hacked emails from her offices, a vindicated Bernie Sanders told ABC News (Yahoo.com 7/25/16), 1 “I told you a long time ago that the DNC was not running a fair operation, that they were supporting Secretary Clinton.”  Unfortunately, his campaign manager spoke to the contrary in one of those emails, thanking the DNC for its cooperation: “By and large the people in the DNC have been good to us!”

Wasserman Schulz

Debbie Wasserman Schulz courtesy of www.newsweek.com

 That Sanders chooses to expand his animus beyond Wasserman Schulz to include the entire DNC is a matter for his conscience, but why should anyone be surprised about the bias? Sanders is newly arrived as a Democrat.  Hillary Clinton has been its foot soldier for years.  We humans are tribal and our loyalties lie with members of our clan. What surprised me when I looked at 200 of these emails was how little bias seemed to exist.  Franklin Foer of Slate calls the emails, “banal gripes and mutterings.”  Jeffery Tobin in NewYorker.com agrees, having found no  “dark conspiracies,” but people spouting off in harmless office chatter.  (“Signs point to Russia in damaging DNC Leak,” The Week, Aug. 5, 2016, pg. 5.)

Still, idealists are unwilling to see the emails as harmless. Whether they be Tea Party members or red-eyed progressives, they are uncompromising in their demand for perfection.  One Sanders supporter affirmed she would never vote for Hillary Clinton, as if Hillary were a part of this bickering.  To do so, she insisted, would betray all Bernie Sanders fought for.  Apparently, Sanders feels no sense of betrayal when he urges his supporters to heal the party and preserve the hard won goals now part of the DNC platform.  Not to support him or, more accurately, not to support his ideas, lacks reason.  

Frankly, among these purists, I sense a few zealots who are willing to see the country brought to its knees in the apocalyptic fires of a Trump election. Like  Vladimir Lenin, they would destroy the nation in order to rebuild it.  This longing for Armageddon is dangerous and near to insanity.  Sanders supporters would be wise to think twice before being seduced by that siren song. 

 

 

Social Share
6 Comments
  1. Betsy August 16, 2016 at 8:49 am Reply
    You go, girl!
    • Caroline Miller August 16, 2016 at 9:35 am Reply
      It would appear that you, at least, have ear plugs, Betsy.
  2. MaryBeth Kelly August 16, 2016 at 11:54 am Reply
    I figured the emails would not pan out to much more than what has been found. I appreciate how you have so clearly presented a rational approach this situation. Above all, as usual, I am delighted with your literary allusions, particularly that last paragraph. Thanks for your thoughts.
    • Caroline Miller August 16, 2016 at 12:03 pm Reply
      I thank you for your comment, MaryBeth. This is not always a time where reason holds sway. A dangerous time.
  3. Deanna Woods August 16, 2016 at 6:42 pm Reply
    Thank you! You nailed it!
    • Caroline Miller August 16, 2016 at 8:24 pm Reply
      I wish you were correct about that, Deanna, but there do seem to be some intractable people out there. I'll keep hammering away, in any case. Thanks for leaving your comment.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Portland, Oregon author Caroline Miller had distinguished careers as an educator, union president, elected official and artist/advocate.

Her play, Woman on the Scarlet Beast, was performed at the Post5 Theatre, Portland, OR, January/February 2015

Caroline published a serialized novelette, Marie Eau-Claire, on the website, The Colored Lens.  She also published the story Gustav Pavel,  a parable about ordinary lives, choice and alternate potential, on the website Fixional.co.

Caroline has published four novels

  • Ballet Noir
  • Trompe l’Oeil
  • Gothic Spring
  • Heart Land

Subscribe to Caroline’s Blog


 

Archives

Categories

YouTube-logo-inline2 To access and subscribe to my videos on YouTube, Click Here and click the Subscribe button.

Banner art “The Receptive” by Charlie White of Charlie White Studio

Web Admin: ThinPATH Systems, Inc
support@tp-sys.com

Subscribe to Caroline's Blog


 

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Sitemap | Privacy Notice

AUDIO & VIDEO VAULT

View archives of Caroline’s audio and videos interviews.


Copyright © Books by Caroline Miller