CONTACT CAROLINE
facebook
rss
tumblr
twitter
goodreads
youtube

  • Home
  • Write Away Blog
  • Books
    • Books
    • Trompe l’Oeil
    • Heart Land
    • Gothic Spring
    • Ballet Noir
    • Book Excerpts
  • Video Interviews
  • Press
    • News
    • Print Interviews
    • Plays
    • Ballet Noir in the Press
    • Trompe l’Oeil In The Press
    • Gothic Spring In The Press
    • Heart Land Reviews
  • Contact
  • About
  • Resources
    • Writer Resources
    • Favorite Blogs
    • Favorite Artists



The One True Longing

Aug 29, 2017
by Caroline Miller
"The Gap", "The Language God Talks", "The Last Man Sanding", Herman Wouk, Nina Bai, Thomas Suddendorf
2 Comments

The Gap is a new book by Thomas Suddendorf that argues the reason homo sapiens stand intellectually above other animals isn’t a matter of engineering but the results of having outlived our nearest competitors. According to the author, as little as 30,000 years ago, “several species of upright-walking intelligent hominins shared the earth with our ancestors.” (“The Last Man Standing,” by Nina Bai, Scientific American Mind, Nov/Dec 2013 pg 72). Scientists don’t know why they disappeared but evidence exists to suggest they shared many of our characteristics, including performing burial rites and making jewelry.

 But even with the disappearance of our nearest challengers, If we set the bar low enough, we can find similar shared characteristics with a number of creatures. Parrots can speak, ants have agriculture, and crows make tools. One specie, the Great Apes, can recognize their reflections in a mirror, which suggests they have self awareness. Still, these similarities aren’t enough to give even our nearest rival a viable edge. Humans stand at the top of the heap because, as, Suddendorf explains, we have two unique capacities: imagination and a “strong drive to link our minds together by looking to one another for information and understanding.” (Ibid pg. 72)

 Imagination and communion. I like Suddendorf’s understanding of us and think it far better than settling upon opposing thumbs as our distinguishing feature. Communion, for example, has an element of the spiritual which defines us a much as any physical enumeration of our characteristics. Unlike the great physicist, Richard Feynman, who said calculus was God’s language, I’m forced to disagree because calculus is a tool too rigid to express our notion of the divine. (The Language God Talks by Herman Wouk, Little Brown 2012, pg. 16) To my mind, art is more suitable to the task as it uses imagination to reach beyond our senses. Talking about the divine may strike some as a strange, coming from an atheist, but to say, “I do not know whether or not there is a God,” does not negate an innate longing for one. I know that longing exists. And I know, too, it is the essence of what separates us from our fellow creatures.

Man in the Universe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Courtesy of cmarchesin.blogspot.com)

(Originally published 1/22/14)

 

Social Share
2 Comments
  1. tuna cole January 23, 2014 at 1:42 pm Reply
    Dear Carolyn, It looks like you were having a bit of a bad day with this post. Please don't take these observations as a personal criticism, but merely as an attempt to nudge you toward a little more self-editing. In chronological order: 1) By convention, we capitalize the genus and lower case species designation, as in "Homo sapiens." 2) We are "upright-walking intelligent" hominids, not "hominins." 3) "specie" refers to money, and is not the singular of "species," which is both singular and plural for unique life forms. 4) The "Great Apes" comprise something like eight species (if memory serves) of which we are one. 5) Opposable thumbs are not unique to Homo sapiens, but are characteristic of all "great apes" (all simians?). 6) Exactly speaking, one who adopts the position of not knowing "whether or not there is a God" is not an atheist but an agnostic. You do good work, Carolyn. As I've said before, I enjoy reading the results of your omnivorous curiosity. I sincerely hoe you don't take these observations "the wrong way." Best, Tuna
    • Caroline Miller January 23, 2014 at 1:57 pm Reply
      You are right, Tuna, a bad dy at the computer. Thank you for your thought remarks. Read your comments and guillty on some but not all. As I say, by your readers you are taught. I appreciate your criticque and will attempt to do better.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Portland, Oregon author Caroline Miller had distinguished careers as an educator, union president, elected official and artist/advocate.

Her play, Woman on the Scarlet Beast, was performed at the Post5 Theatre, Portland, OR, January/February 2015

Caroline published a serialized novelette, Marie Eau-Claire, on the website, The Colored Lens.  She also published the story Gustav Pavel,  a parable about ordinary lives, choice and alternate potential, on the website Fixional.co.

Caroline has published four novels

  • Ballet Noir
  • Trompe l’Oeil
  • Gothic Spring
  • Heart Land

Subscribe to Caroline’s Blog


 

Archives

Categories

YouTube-logo-inline2 To access and subscribe to my videos on YouTube, Click Here and click the Subscribe button.

Banner art “The Receptive” by Charlie White of Charlie White Studio

Web Admin: ThinPATH Systems, Inc
support@tp-sys.com

Subscribe to Caroline's Blog


 

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Sitemap | Privacy Notice

AUDIO & VIDEO VAULT

View archives of Caroline’s audio and videos interviews.


Copyright © Books by Caroline Miller