CONTACT CAROLINE
facebook
rss
tumblr
twitter
goodreads
youtube

  • Home
  • Write Away Blog
  • Books
    • Books
    • Trompe l’Oeil
    • Heart Land
    • Gothic Spring
    • Ballet Noir
    • Book Excerpts
  • Video Interviews
  • Press
    • News
    • Print Interviews
    • Plays
    • Ballet Noir in the Press
    • Trompe l’Oeil In The Press
    • Gothic Spring In The Press
    • Heart Land Reviews
  • Contact
  • About
  • Resources
    • Writer Resources
    • Favorite Blogs
    • Favorite Artists



Corrupt Patriotism

Oct 07, 2021
by Caroline Miller
"Just Read It", Ashley Taggart, Christopher Comer, Donald Trump, Eric Hoffer, Mitch McConnell, nihilism, Oedipus Rex, Piranesi, Sophocles, Susanna Clarke
3 Comments

Satan Devouring His Son by Goya courtesy of wikipedia.org,

“We are a storytelling species, every bit as much as a tool-using one,” writes the author of The English Professor Who Foresaw Modern Neuroscience.   I agree. As a teacher, I would tell my students, “If you want to see how your mind works, write something.”  Composition exposes not only bias but logical gaps that remain unobservable as private thoughts.  

Today, neuroscience tells us why we are storytellers. A link exists between memory and imagination. “…remembering past events and imagining future ones share similar cognitive network space within the brain.” (Ibid, pg. 40.)   Both functions store information, not as a snapshot but in narrative clusters that may involve letters or images, or emotions.  (Ibid, pg. 39.)  Writing stories about ourselves to understand ourselves seems to be natural.

During a discussion of Susanna Clarke’s novel Piranesi on “Just Read It,”  I locked horns with a guest about the book’s eponymous central character. I thought he was a tragic figure.  The guest called Piranesi “resilient.” I agreed then pointed to the central figure of Sophocles’ play, Oedipus Rex. Here was a resilient man whose life was tragic.  Likewise, Piranesi endures, yet he is strung between two worlds, neither of which completes him. The conflict deprives him of a coherent view of himself and leaves readers to question his sanity.

Donald Trump, our 45th president is a man conflicted by many incoherent views about his world, leading some to question his mental health. Can a person untroubled by contradiction be stable?  Because Trump is no longer president, the question would be academic, except that he has legitimized an affliction that is more common than once thought.   

Calling themselves “patriots,” some among us feel entitled to assault their capital, attempt to assassinate elected leaders, and are so inured to violence as a form of resolution, they attack health care professionals during a pandemic and teachers who struggle to keep children safe. That they choose to take dangerous and unproven remedies rather than a vaccine that is effective shows the depth of their dysfunction.

Members of Congress aren’t exempt.  Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority leader, comes to mind.  In recent years, he’s reversed his position on the filibuster; Supreme Court Judge appointments, and Trump’s impeachment, declaring on that occasion the president was unfit for office yet refusing to impeach him. Most recently, we have his argument against voting to lift the debt ceiling, an action he has supported in the past. 

Eric Hoffer had something to say about the nature of this disorder:

 The fiercest fanatics are often selfish people who were forced, by innate shortcomings or external circumstances, to lose faith in their own selves. They separate the excellent instrument of their selfishness from their ineffectual selves and attach it to the service of some holy cause.   

(The True Believer, Chapter VII, ”The Inordinately Selfish,” by Erick Hoffer, Harper Perennial, 1951, pg. 48.)

Is it possible that selfishness lies at the center of the current cynicism?  As a nation, we’ve suffered little compared to others. Has this privilege given rise to egregious self-interest? Are there among us people so convinced of their superiority that they would prefer to bring down democracy rather than share wealth and power?

If so, their decision over time will betray them. The past is not a prologue to the future. Climate change and the earth’s dwindling resources are fomenting swells of population migration.  Border walls and voter suppression will not stem that tide. The country needs a new vision. First, we must recognize the tools of capitalism and competition, alone, no longer serve. Second, let us diagnose the problem correctly. Those who choose to fight rather than share are neither rational nor patriots.   

Nihilism is the destructive impulse of the insane. Hopefully, a majority of us understand that patriotism is about more than the right to pursue personal happiness and freedom.  Patriotism includes obligation. “… ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.”

Social Share
3 Comments
  1. GNW October 7, 2021 at 9:39 am Reply
    Ever brilliant young lady!
    • Caroline Miller October 7, 2021 at 2:15 pm Reply
      How kind. At 85, I never thought to be described as young woman again. :)
  2. Pete October 8, 2021 at 5:09 pm Reply
    Agree with Comment #1 "Can a person untroubled by contradiction be stable? " I've been mulling over this rhetorical question, trying to connect the idea of contradiction to mental stability... If refusing to explain or rationalize contradiction were a sign of mental instability, most of us would not pass the smell test… Of course there are many kinds of contradiction, formal, linguistic, mathematical, to name a few, but in everyday life we tend to practice a form of psychological contradiction, where our actions belie our words, for example, unless you are a comedian, you shouldn't say you dislike ice cream while enthusiastically eating it… Perhaps recognizing that contradiction is a feature built into the fabric of language and of thought itself, many intellectuals have embraced it… Emerson's "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds"... Whitman's "Do I contradict myself? Very well, then, I contradict myself.”... Freud in his various writings acknowledging the shock value of contradicting the patient in order to analyze the response… This leads one to believe that in the background is an unspoken reference to a certain celebrity-politician, who once declared himself to be "a very stable genius"… In 2020, a book with that title appeared... To be fair, as NPR's book reviewer concedes, Trump was faced with a loaded question: "Accused of being either unthinking or unstable, Trump at the time denied being either. He was, he said, 'a very stable genius.' Whether the president meant that with a touch of self-deprecating humor or not, it functions here as the epitome of self-delusion." https://www.npr.org/2020/01/15/796128983/latest-retelling-of-trumps-term-smacks-of-a-prosecutor-s-courtroom-summation How Trump's reply leads directly to self-delusion is not explained... Freud might have had an answer: Apparent contradictions, moments of unthinking, slips of the tongue and so forth can be read in bono or in malo, and we in turn are judged by the choices we make in our interpretations...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Buy This Book on Amazon


“Heart Land: A Place Called Ockley Green” is available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble. The novel is also available as an eBook (Kindle and Nook.


Or buy directly from the publisher by clicking on the “Buy Now” button below.

Heart Land




Image of author Caroline Miller


Interview: Caroline Miller on Back Page with Jody Seay

Banner art “The Receptive” by Charlie White of Charlie White Studio

Web Admin: ThinPATH Systems, Inc
support@tp-sys.com

Subscribe to Caroline's Blog


 

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Sitemap | Privacy Notice

AUDIO & VIDEO VAULT

View archives of Caroline’s audio and videos interviews.


Copyright © Books by Caroline Miller