CONTACT CAROLINE
facebook
rss
tumblr
twitter
goodreads
youtube

  • Home
  • Write Away Blog
  • Books
    • Books
    • Trompe l’Oeil
    • Heart Land
    • Gothic Spring
    • Ballet Noir
    • Book Excerpts
  • Video Interviews
  • Press
    • News
    • Print Interviews
    • Plays
    • Ballet Noir in the Press
    • Trompe l’Oeil In The Press
    • Gothic Spring In The Press
    • Heart Land Reviews
  • Contact
  • About
  • Resources
    • Writer Resources
    • Favorite Blogs
    • Favorite Artists



Dawkins Versus A Gray Area

Nov 17, 2014
by Caroline Miller
An Appetite for Wonder, Darwinism and the spiritual, John Gray, Richard Dawkins
4 Comments

Richard Dawkins has published the first of his two part memoir, An Appetite for Wonder,  and John Gray, emeritus professor of European thought at the London School of Economics, has taken the work apart with surgical deftness. He depicts Dawkins as a man who is facile in his thinking, but is an ideologue without much originality and a bit old fashioned. (“The Dogmatist,” by John Gray, The New Republic, October 13, 2014, pgs. 36-14)

 The main charge raised against Dawkins is that he elevates Darwinism to the status of a religion and forgets that, like Einstein’s work, Darwin advanced a theory, not a verifiable truth.  Too much faith in Darwinism has left Dawkins wearing blinders, according to Gray.   Science is a tool which, if embraced too fully, excludes other ways of understanding the universe.  What’s more, science provides no moral compass for human behavior.  Josef Mengela and his band of Nazi doctors are a prime example of the evil science can do when it is left without a conscience. 

According to Gray, Dawkins fails to understand that no evitable animosity exists between science and religion because no connection between them requires that one falsify the other. (Ibid, pg. 41)   When Dawkins uses Darwinism as his default button, Gray insists the author banishes free will, a benefit religion provides but not possible with scientific determinism.  (Ibid, pg. 41.)  What’s more, we know spirituality exists in the human brain but as yet, science can give no explanation for it.  (Brain)

 Gray believes spirituality is necessary for the survival of the species.  Consciousness seeks to know itself and to have a higher purpose and so God was invented.   

I have already admitted that I am no fan of Dawkins. (Blog 11/12/12)  But Gray’s dissection of the man delights me neither.  Gray has his own point of view which he defends deftly.  But were I to put my faith in any scientific theory, I would chose the principle of uncertainty.   If all the purveyors of dogma would bend their knee to it, then  tolerance might have a chance to clear the air of a good deal of smug righteousness.

Courtesy of Dochanin.blogspot.com

Social Share
4 Comments
  1. louis wachsmuth November 17, 2014 at 9:08 am Reply
    perhaps you remember the great essay of phillip lopate , feb 16 2013, NYT, the essay, an exercise in doubt. i printed and mounted it to remind me to question everything. as a christian but hater of organized religion this has given me courage to question authority. i am no fan of Dawkins either.
    • Caroline Miller November 17, 2014 at 2:15 pm Reply
      No, I'm not familiar with that essay. I'll look it up. If you printed it out, it is worth nothing. Thank you for the suggesting reading, Louis.
  2. John Briggs November 17, 2014 at 6:13 pm Reply
    I am not certain about any uncertainty principle. Taken as a principle, it is in fact certain, which leads me to doubt that uncertainty can be uncertain. Then again, certainty in many instances is certainly uncertain. The principle in that case is that we should be certain only when we add a measure of uncertainty, and uncertain with a measure of certainty. John Briggs
    • Caroline Miller November 17, 2014 at 7:16 pm Reply
      Of course, John. I'm delighted you were here to clear the matter up so succinctly. I am now sadder and wiser.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Portland, Oregon author Caroline Miller had distinguished careers as an educator, union president, elected official and artist/advocate.

Her play, Woman on the Scarlet Beast, was performed at the Post5 Theatre, Portland, OR, January/February 2015

Caroline published a serialized novelette, Marie Eau-Claire, on the website, The Colored Lens.  She also published the story Gustav Pavel,  a parable about ordinary lives, choice and alternate potential, on the website Fixional.co.

Caroline has published four novels

  • Ballet Noir
  • Trompe l’Oeil
  • Gothic Spring
  • Heart Land

Subscribe to Caroline’s Blog


 

Archives

Categories

YouTube-logo-inline2 To access and subscribe to my videos on YouTube, Click Here and click the Subscribe button.

Banner art “The Receptive” by Charlie White of Charlie White Studio

Web Admin: ThinPATH Systems, Inc
support@tp-sys.com

Subscribe to Caroline's Blog


 

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Sitemap | Privacy Notice

AUDIO & VIDEO VAULT

View archives of Caroline’s audio and videos interviews.


Copyright © Books by Caroline Miller