CONTACT CAROLINE
facebook
rss
tumblr
twitter
goodreads
youtube

  • Home
  • Write Away Blog
  • Books
    • Books
    • Trompe l’Oeil
    • Heart Land
    • Gothic Spring
    • Ballet Noir
    • Book Excerpts
  • Video Vault
  • Audio
  • Press
    • News
    • Print Interviews
    • Plays
    • Ballet Noir in the Press
    • Trompe l’Oeil In The Press
    • Gothic Spring In The Press
    • Heart Land Reviews
  • Contact
  • About
  • Resources
    • Writer Resources
    • Favorite Blogs
    • Favorite Artists



If Stones Could Talk What Would They Say?

Feb 04, 2013
by Caroline Miller
"Madame Blavatsky: The Mother of Modern Spirituality", Gary Lachman
2 Comments

When I was young, I took an interest in people whose lives led them along roads less traveled and yet who were influential. Rasputin was one. He lived in the 19th century as a religious pilgrim and was embraced as a healer by Alexandra, the last Czarina of Russia. Count Calistoga was another. He lived in the 18th century, dabbled in the occult and was nearly hanged as a Freemason. Emanuel Swendenborg was a third person of interest. He was a man of the 18th century, also, who considered himself a scientist but wrote accounts of his conversations with angels. Now a new biography has been written which will make my reading list. This time the subject is a woman, Madame Petrovna Blavatsky, of the 19th century, who is the founder of Theosophy, a movement meant to foster universal brotherhood. The book is entitled Madame Blavatsky: The Mother of Modern Spirituality by Gary Lachman.

 As John Crowley wrote in his review of the book, “There are people whose life stories resemble novels, replete with adventures, wild coincidences, struggles and happy (or tragic) endings. Then there are people whose life stories are novels…[for] to read accounts of their lives requires suspension of disbelief.” (“Madame and the Masters,” by John Crowley, Harper’s February, 2013, pg. 81) According to him, Madame Blavatsky’s story is among the latter.

 Remarkably enough, her ideas are now being whispered among theoretical physicists and mathematician as possible explanations for scientific questions. For example, if we are all made of star dust, the residue of the Big Bang, do we carry with us a consciousness that is universal even to inanimate objects like pebbles and stones? (Ibid. pg. 82) Certainly, in her time, many people of note were drawn to her philosophy — Arthur Conan Doyle, William James, Ralph Waldo Emerson, W. B. Yeats and Thomas Edison among them. Even Charles Darwin attended a séance and, for a time, Mohandas Gandhi became a student. (Ibid, pg. 83)

 It does seem to me that after all the measurements, analysis and dissections of the natural worlds that science has made, the sum or should I say the soul of the parts is missing and so many minds keep searching for that higher plane. To the curious and the seekers, I bring this biography to their attention. They may find Madame Blavatsky’s unique journey worthy of their time.

Madam Blavatsky

 

 

 

 

(Courtesy of abebooks.com) 

 

Social Share
2 Comments
  1. hugh fuve February 7, 2013 at 12:26 pm Reply
    Thank you Caroline - you inspire us to think, something I gave up long ago for fear of being so disconnected from others that I just feel crazy and alien. You have brought forward this idea... Every quantum space, no matter how large or small, is communicating and changing with a self interest. Doesn't this imply consciousness is at play? Even a rock, will heat and cool and melt and change state, it is not so static. It communicates. It also demands that it occupy a little piece of space, all of its own, no matter how crowded that space is. Nothing else can really know what is inside that space unless information is extracted through magnetic forces or gravity. And yet the information extracted is not the truth, but just partial information and a conversion and reconstruction and interpretation is needed. The ability of the receiver is limited by its own limited understanding of its personal space and can only assume that things are similar - over there. But chaos reveals to us that nothing is identical, just by nature of its co-ordinates every single space is absolutely unique. It is effectively a universe all unto itself. When you take this view the universe starts to look a lot simpler. Every space being unique, and information being exchanged and processed by rules and variables that are unique for every single quantum space. If this were NOT true, then there could be no such thing as randomness in our universe, and by implication there could be no such thing as a truly unique conscious thought, we would all be trundling along on a predetermined course entirely dictated by preconditions. Our intuition tells us this is not possible, our fears tell us otherwise. Fear be damned! What I find interesting is that the RATE of this information processing and exchange is variable and slows down with complexity. When the universe gets very complicated and dense, the rate of change becomes very slow. This is not unlike a computer that is overburdened with work. So these seem like missing variables in our understanding of everything. Conscious self interest, information retention and exchange seem to be inadequately addressed in Quantum theory. Along with our perception of time, which needs to be simplified to just being the rate of change for a given space, which is variable and affected by computational complexity. Add also that quantum scale is variable and relative, IE a mechanical binary switch will function identically no matter what scale it is fashioned and likewise our universe can vary its rate of change and scale and shrink and expand while every single bit of it no matter how small thinks for itself. This would imply that while Einstein predicted light bending within a gravitational field, it is NOT gravity that is at work. Instead gravity is a signature of increased complexity and the expenditure of energy, and space time could be re-scaling itself in order to maintain itself. Where does mass go when matter shrinks? Into light and motion and the magnetic field - all the parts of the universe then shrink and appear to move away from each other. Everything thinks, but it also implodes at a pace relative to the rate of information exchange, which also varies with computational complexity. Our bodies become a collection of independent universes and we just exist in between them, like little gods that are made of trillions of universes, each of them functioning independently of each other and sending messages to each other at the expense of their scale. The internal space of those universes bubble up and reveal secrets of themselves to provide the source of randomness within our perceived realm and scale. Thank you, I will go back into my hole now.. alone... dark .. silent .. watching and listening.
    • Caroline Miller February 7, 2013 at 2:08 pm Reply
      Hello Hugh, Thank you for dropping by and I hope you will call again. I was profoundly touched by what you'd written and am certain others were too. As there is limited space for me to reply, let me touch upon one point you raised, "The ability of the receiver is limited to its own limited understanding of its state." Psychologists have argued that compassion is a brdige that grows from our comman experiences. We recognize humanity in others when we share similar experiences and can relate. If there is any truth to this notion, which seems reasonable, then cominng to understand our uniqueness should be part of the equation as well. Perhaps compassion begins with understanding that, being unique, each of us is isolated. We live in private cells, each of us sending tapping noises through the walls. To accept that we are universally different may be another basis for compassion. To know our ignorance is to find our tolerance. In this quest, Reason may have a greater part to play than shared feelings. Reason plus ignorance equals compassion? An interesting justaposition of terms. You've given me a new thought to toy with and I thank you for it. Keep tapping on the wall.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

 

Portland, Oregon author Caroline Miller had distinguished careers as an educator, union president, elected official and artist/advocate.

Her play, Woman on the Scarlet Beast, was performed at the Post5 Theatre, Portland, OR, January/February 2015

Caroline published a serialized novelette, Marie Eau-Claire, on the website, The Colored Lens.  She also published the story Gustav Pavel,  a parable about ordinary lives, choice and alternate potential, on the website Fixional.co.

Caroline has published five novels

  • Getting Lost To Find Home
  • Ballet Noir
  • Trompe l’Oeil
  • Gothic Spring
  • Heart Land

Subscribe to Caroline’s Blog


 

Archives

Categories

YouTube-logo-inline2 To access and subscribe to my videos on YouTube, Click Here and click the Subscribe button.

Banner art “The Receptive” by Charlie White of Charlie White Studio

Thanks to Kateshia Pendergrass for Caroline’s picture.

Web Admin: ThinPATH Systems, Inc
support@tp-sys.com

Subscribe to Caroline's Blog


 

Contact Caroline at

carolinemiller11@yahoo.com

Sitemap | Privacy Notice

AUDIO & VIDEO VAULT

View archives of Caroline’s audio and videos interviews.


Copyright © Books by Caroline Miller